Free and Open
This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.
Finding
01An open network, strong civil liberties, independent institutions, and robust data protection support a top-tier result. Narrow surveillance and capacity gaps remain.
The score draws on country reporting, network measurements, shutdown records, journalist cases, privacy law, and rule-of-law data. The indicator findings below show how that evidence was converted into points. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.
Data-protection rights and secure communications are broadly available, subject to bounded surveillance powers.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
8 cited sources support this assessment.
Scored assessment
02Each indicator receives 0–4 points. Five indicators form a pillar. The pillar average is converted to a percentage and multiplied by its published weight.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
Liechtenstein: OONI measurements and the Access Now shutdown record provide the incident check; No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.. [2][3][4]
Liechtenstein's B1 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; the country OONI dashboard supplies direct network measurements. [3][1]
Liechtenstein's B2 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4; No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.. [2][1]
Liechtenstein's B4 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the circumvention check. [3][1]
Liechtenstein's B5 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Online political debate is broad and legal protections generally remain effective.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; the relevant Freedom House country score 90/100. [1][7]
Liechtenstein's C1 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and due process 4/4; Freedom House country reporting supplies the offense and enforcement record. [2][1]
Liechtenstein's C2 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded due process 4/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; CPJ and Freedom House records provide the documented case check. [2][5][1]
Liechtenstein's C3 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; the 2026 RSF press-freedom score 82.6/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the violence, harassment, and accountability record. [5][8][1]
Liechtenstein's C4 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Data-protection rights and secure communications are broadly available, subject to bounded surveillance powers.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded private discussion 4/4 and due process 4/4; UNCTAD and Freedom House records provide the retention and identity-law check. [1][6]
Liechtenstein's D3 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Liechtenstein: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; the RSF press-freedom environment 82.6/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the targeted-surveillance case record. [5][1]
Liechtenstein's D4 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Independent courts, regulators, and public procedures provide meaningful checks and remedies.
Country findings
03These are the principal findings for each scored part of the report. The indicator records above provide the supporting detail.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
[2][3][4]Online political debate is broad and legal protections generally remain effective.
[2][5][8]Data-protection rights and secure communications are broadly available, subject to bounded surveillance powers.
[6][1]Independent courts, regulators, and public procedures provide meaningful checks and remedies.
[7][1]Research record
04Principality of Liechtenstein, assessed from January 1 through December 31, 2025.
Network measurements, legal and institutional datasets, shutdown records, and documented cases support the findings.
Twenty indicators measure content openness, expression, privacy, security, and institutional checks under Methodology v0.3.
Source register
05Country reporting, open measurements, and cross-national datasets form the report record.