Country assessmentResearch confidence: Medium · Evidence coverage: Standard

Grenada · 2026

Grenada

The network remains open and civic participation competitive. Legal pressure, privacy gaps, and uneven institutional capacity keep the score below the top tier.

Assessment windowJanuary 1–December 31, 2025
Research cutoffJuly 17, 2026
FrameworkMethodology v0.3 · 20 indicators
Territory coverageGrenada

Why Grenada received this score.

The network remains open and civic participation competitive. Legal pressure, privacy gaps, and uneven institutional capacity keep the score below the top tier.

The score draws on country reporting, network measurements, shutdown records, journalist cases, privacy law, and rule-of-law data. The indicator findings below show how that evidence was converted into points. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Overall score76.3

Generally Free

This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.

Highest pillar87.5

Open Internet & Content Controls

No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.

Lowest pillar62.5

Rule of Law & Accountability

Formal remedies exist, but cost, delay, secrecy, or inconsistent enforcement limits their practical value.

Evidence record8

Standard coverage

8 cited sources support this assessment.

Indicator scores.

Each indicator receives 0–4 points. Five indicators form a pillar. The pillar average is converted to a percentage and multiplied by its published weight.

B
30% weight

Open Internet & Content Controls

No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.

87.526.3 / 30 points
B1Shutdowns and throttling3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: OONI measurements and the Access Now shutdown record provide the incident check; No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.. [2][3][4]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's B1 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

B2Website and service blocking3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; the country OONI dashboard supplies direct network measurements. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's B2 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

B3Removal and filtering orders3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's B3 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

B4Intermediary liability3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4; No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's B4 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

B5Circumvention and cross-border access3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the circumvention check. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's B5 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

C
30% weight

Free Expression & Civic Space

Speech laws, official pressure, or civil liability create recurring risks for journalists and online critics.

75.022.5 / 30 points
C1Legal protection for expression3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and private discussion 4/4; WJP's effective-expression measure 2.6/4; the relevant Freedom House country score 89/100. [1][7]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's C1 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

C2Speech-related offenses3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and due process 3/4; Freedom House country reporting supplies the offense and enforcement record. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's C2 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

C3Arrests and penalties3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded due process 3/4 and equal treatment under law 3/4; CPJ and Freedom House records provide the documented case check. [2][5][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's C3 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

C4Harassment, violence, and digital attacks3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and equal treatment under law 3/4; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the violence, harassment, and accountability record. [5][8][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's C4 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

C5Civic participation and pluralism3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded political choice free from domination 4/4 and assembly freedom 4/4; WJP's civic-participation measure 2.5/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's C5 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

D
20% weight

Privacy, Anonymity & User Security

Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.

75.015.0 / 20 points
D1Data protection rights2.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: WJP's effective-privacy measure 1.6/4; Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.. [6][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's D1 evidence supports 2.5/4. Meaningful safeguards coexist with material restrictions.

D2Surveillance law and authorization2.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 4/4 and due process 3/4; WJP's effective-privacy measure 1.6/4. [1][7]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's D2 evidence supports 2.5/4. Meaningful safeguards coexist with material restrictions.

D3Retention, access, and identity mandates3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded private discussion 4/4 and due process 3/4; UNCTAD and Freedom House records provide the retention and identity-law check. [1][6]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's D3 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

D4Targeted surveillance and spyware3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded media freedom 3/4 and equal treatment under law 3/4; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the targeted-surveillance case record. [5][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's D4 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

D5Encryption and anonymity3.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded private discussion 4/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the encryption and anonymity check. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's D5 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.

E
20% weight

Rule of Law & Accountability

Formal remedies exist, but cost, delay, secrecy, or inconsistent enforcement limits their practical value.

62.512.5 / 20 points
E1Judicial independence and due process2.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 4/4 and due process 3/4; WJP's judicial-constraint measure 2.8/4; administrative due-process measure 1.6/4; civil-justice independence measure 2.8/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's E1 evidence supports 2.5/4. Meaningful safeguards coexist with material restrictions.

E2Independent regulators2.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded government safeguards against corruption 3/4 and government openness and transparency 3/4; WJP's independent-review measure 1.7/4; regulatory independence measure 3.2/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's E2 evidence supports 2.5/4. Meaningful safeguards coexist with material restrictions.

E3Government transparency2.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded government openness and transparency 3/4; WJP's publicized-laws measure 1.2/4; right-to-information measure 1.6/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's E3 evidence supports 2.0/4. Restrictions are recurrent and safeguards are only partly effective.

E4Notice, appeal, and remedy2.5 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 4/4 and due process 3/4; WJP's complaint-mechanisms measure 2.1/4; civil-justice access measure 2.4/4; civil-justice enforcement measure 1.3/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's E4 evidence supports 2.5/4. Meaningful safeguards coexist with material restrictions.

E5Open and multistakeholder policymaking3.0 / 4
Observed record

Grenada: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded elected officials' authority 4/4 and assembly freedom 4/4; WJP's civic-participation measure 2.5/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Grenada's E5 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.

Findings by pillar.

These are the principal findings for each scored part of the report. The indicator records above provide the supporting detail.

Pillar B

Open Internet & Content Controls

No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.

[2][3][4]
Pillar C

Free Expression & Civic Space

Speech laws, official pressure, or civil liability create recurring risks for journalists and online critics.

[2][5][8]
Pillar D

Privacy, Anonymity & User Security

Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.

[6][1]
Pillar E

Rule of Law & Accountability

Formal remedies exist, but cost, delay, secrecy, or inconsistent enforcement limits their practical value.

[7][1]

Coverage

Grenada, assessed from January 1 through December 31, 2025.

Evidence

Network measurements, legal and institutional datasets, shutdown records, and documented cases support the findings.

Scoring

Twenty indicators measure content openness, expression, privacy, security, and institutional checks under Methodology v0.3.

Read the full methodology →

Sources used for this report.

Country reporting, open measurements, and cross-national datasets form the report record.

  1. 01
    Freedom HouseGrenada: Freedom in the World 2025 country reportCivil society · 2025 edition
  2. 02
    Digital Society ProjectDigital Society Project Dataset v8Independent measurement · 2000–2025 country-year data
  3. 03
    Open Observatory of Network InterferenceGrenada measurement dashboardIndependent measurement · Accessed July 17, 2026
  4. 04
    Access Now and the #KeepItOn coalitionInternet Shutdowns in 2025 Annual ReportCivil society · March 2026
  5. 05
    Committee to Protect Journalists2025 journalist prison census and case databaseCivil society · January 21, 2026
  6. 06
    UN Trade and DevelopmentData protection and privacy legislation worldwideInternational organization · Accessed July 17, 2026
  7. 07
    World Justice ProjectRule of Law Index 2025Independent measurement · October 28, 2025
  8. 08
    Reporters Without BordersWorld Press Freedom Index 2026Civil society · May 2026