Country assessmentResearch confidence: Low · Evidence coverage: Standard

Ethiopia · 2026

Ethiopia

Shutdowns, conflict-related restrictions, arrests, surveillance, and weak independent oversight leave little dependable online freedom.

Assessment windowJanuary 1–December 31, 2025
Research cutoffJuly 17, 2026
FrameworkMethodology v0.3 · 20 indicators
Territory coverageEthiopia

Why Ethiopia received this score.

Shutdowns, conflict-related restrictions, arrests, surveillance, and weak independent oversight leave little dependable online freedom.

The score draws on country reporting, network measurements, shutdown records, journalist cases, privacy law, and rule-of-law data. The indicator findings below show how that evidence was converted into points. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Overall score30.8

Highly Restricted

This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.

Highest pillar37.5

Open Internet & Content Controls

Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.

Lowest pillar20.0

Rule of Law & Accountability

No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.

Evidence record8

Standard coverage

8 cited sources support this assessment.

Indicator scores.

Each indicator receives 0–4 points. Five indicators form a pillar. The pillar average is converted to a percentage and multiplied by its published weight.

B
30% weight

Open Internet & Content Controls

Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.

37.511.3 / 30 points
B1Shutdowns and throttling2.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded state control over connectivity 2/6; DSP's 2025 shutdown-practice estimate 2/4; social-media shutdown estimate 2/4; OONI measurements and the Access Now shutdown record provide the incident check. [2][3][4][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's B1 evidence supports 2.0/4. Restrictions are recurrent and safeguards are only partly effective.

B2Website and service blocking1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded content blocking 4/6; DSP's 2025 political-filtering estimate 0/4; the country OONI dashboard supplies direct network measurements. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's B2 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

B3Removal and filtering orders1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded content-removal pressure 2/4 and transparency and appeal safeguards 0/4; DSP's 2025 political-content censorship estimate 1/4; online-speech legal protection 1/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's B3 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

B4Intermediary liability1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded transparency and appeal safeguards 0/4; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 1/4; protection against legal abuse by political elites 2/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's B4 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

B5Circumvention and cross-border access1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded state control over connectivity 2/6 and anonymous and encrypted communication 2/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 0/4; independence from state-controlled social platforms 1/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the circumvention check. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's B5 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

C
30% weight

Free Expression & Civic Space

Authorities use criminal cases, detention, or severe penalties against online expression and organizing.

30.09.0 / 30 points
C1Legal protection for expression1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded legal protection and judicial independence 1/6; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 1/4; WJP's effective-expression measure 0.9/4; the relevant Freedom House country score 30/100. [1][7]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's C1 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

C2Speech-related offenses1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded online-speech liability 0/4; DSP's protection against abuse of defamation and copyright law 2/4; Freedom House country reporting supplies the offense and enforcement record. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's C2 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

C3Arrests and penalties1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded penalties for online activity 2/6; DSP's 2025 political-arrest estimate 1/3; CPJ and Freedom House records provide the documented case check. [2][5][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's C3 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

C4Harassment, violence, and digital attacks1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded violence and intimidation 1/5 and technical attacks 2/3; the 2026 RSF press-freedom score 34.7/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the violence, harassment, and accountability record. [5][8][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's C4 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

C5Civic participation and pluralism1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded online information diversity 2/4 and digital civic mobilization 2/6; DSP's online-media pluralism estimate 2/4; ordinary people's online civic-mobilization estimate 1/4; WJP's civic-participation measure 0.9/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's C5 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

D
20% weight

Privacy, Anonymity & User Security

Broad surveillance powers and limited independent authorization weaken privacy and anonymity.

32.56.5 / 20 points
D1Data protection rights1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded privacy protection 1/6; DSP's privacy-law existence measure 1/1; privacy-law constraint on government access 2/4; WJP's effective-privacy measure 0.2/4. [6][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's D1 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

D2Surveillance law and authorization1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded state surveillance constraints 1/6 and privacy protection 1/6; DSP's protection from political social-media monitoring 1/4; WJP's effective-privacy measure 0.2/4. [1][7]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's D2 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

D3Retention, access, and identity mandates1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded anonymous and encrypted communication 2/4 and state surveillance constraints 1/6; DSP's privacy-law constraint on government access 2/4; protection from political monitoring 1/4; UNCTAD and Freedom House records provide the retention and identity-law check. [1][6]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's D3 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

D4Targeted surveillance and spyware1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded state surveillance constraints 1/6 and technical attacks 2/3; DSP's protection from political monitoring 1/4; the RSF press-freedom environment 34.7/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the targeted-surveillance case record. [5][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's D4 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

D5Encryption and anonymity1.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded anonymous and encrypted communication 2/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 0/4; protection from political monitoring 1/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the encryption and anonymity check. [3][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's D5 evidence supports 1.5/4. Restrictions are widespread, although limited protection remains.

E
20% weight

Rule of Law & Accountability

No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.

20.04.0 / 20 points
E1Judicial independence and due process0.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded legal protection and judicial independence 1/6; WJP's judicial-constraint measure 1.2/4; administrative due-process measure 0.8/4; civil-justice independence measure 1.0/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's E1 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.

E2Independent regulators1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded legal protection and judicial independence 1/6 and privacy protection 1/6; WJP's independent-review measure 1.4/4; regulatory independence measure 1.8/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's E2 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

E3Government transparency0.5 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded transparency and appeal safeguards 0/4 and privacy protection 1/6; WJP's publicized-laws measure 0.9/4; right-to-information measure 1.5/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's E3 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.

E4Notice, appeal, and remedy1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded transparency and appeal safeguards 0/4 and legal protection and judicial independence 1/6; WJP's complaint-mechanisms measure 1.5/4; civil-justice access measure 1.8/4; civil-justice enforcement measure 1.7/4. [7][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's E4 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

E5Open and multistakeholder policymaking1.0 / 4
Observed record

Ethiopia: Freedom House's 2025 country scorecard recorded online information diversity 2/4 and digital civic mobilization 2/6; WJP's civic-participation measure 0.9/4; DSP's online civic-mobilization estimate 1/4. [2][1]

Scoring judgment

Ethiopia's E5 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.

Findings by pillar.

These are the principal findings for each scored part of the report. The indicator records above provide the supporting detail.

Pillar B

Open Internet & Content Controls

Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.

[2][3][4]
Pillar C

Free Expression & Civic Space

Authorities use criminal cases, detention, or severe penalties against online expression and organizing.

[2][5][8]
Pillar D

Privacy, Anonymity & User Security

Broad surveillance powers and limited independent authorization weaken privacy and anonymity.

[6][1]
Pillar E

Rule of Law & Accountability

No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.

[7][1]

Coverage

Ethiopia, assessed from January 1 through December 31, 2025.

Evidence

Network measurements, legal and institutional datasets, shutdown records, and documented cases support the findings.

Scoring

Twenty indicators measure content openness, expression, privacy, security, and institutional checks under Methodology v0.3.

Read the full methodology →

Sources used for this report.

Country reporting, open measurements, and cross-national datasets form the report record.

  1. 01
    Freedom HouseEthiopia: Freedom on the Net 2025 country reportCivil society · 2025 edition
  2. 02
    Digital Society ProjectDigital Society Project Dataset v8Independent measurement · 2000–2025 country-year data
  3. 03
    Open Observatory of Network InterferenceEthiopia measurement dashboardIndependent measurement · Accessed July 17, 2026
  4. 04
    Access Now and the #KeepItOn coalitionInternet Shutdowns in 2025 Annual ReportCivil society · March 2026
  5. 05
    Committee to Protect Journalists2025 journalist prison census and case databaseCivil society · January 21, 2026
  6. 06
    UN Trade and DevelopmentData protection and privacy legislation worldwideInternational organization · Accessed July 17, 2026
  7. 07
    World Justice ProjectRule of Law Index 2025Independent measurement · October 28, 2025
  8. 08
    Reporters Without BordersEthiopia: World Press Freedom Index 2026 profileCivil society · May 2026