Highly Restricted
This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.
Country assessmentResearch confidence: Low · Evidence coverage: Standard
Central African Republic · 2026
Central African Republic
Conflict, connectivity disruption, violence against journalists and civic actors, surveillance risks, and extremely weak institutions leave almost no dependable online freedom.
Assessment windowJanuary 1–December 31, 2025
Research cutoffJuly 17, 2026
FrameworkMethodology v0.3 · 20 indicators
Territory coverageCentral African Republic
Finding
01Why Central African Republic received this score.
Conflict, connectivity disruption, violence against journalists and civic actors, surveillance risks, and extremely weak institutions leave almost no dependable online freedom.
The score draws on country reporting, network measurements, shutdown records, journalist cases, privacy law, and rule-of-law data. The indicator findings below show how that evidence was converted into points. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
Open Internet & Content Controls
Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.
Rule of Law & Accountability
No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.
Standard coverage
8 cited sources support this assessment.
Scored assessment
02Indicator scores.
Each indicator receives 0–4 points. Five indicators form a pillar. The pillar average is converted to a percentage and multiplied by its published weight.
B
30% weight
Open Internet & Content Controls
Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.
30.09.0 / 30 points
B1Shutdowns and throttling2.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: No comprehensive national filtering system is established, but conflict, state pressure, and armed control produce uneven access to reliable information and independent reporting.; DSP's 2025 shutdown-practice estimate 4/4; social-media shutdown estimate 4/4; OONI measurements and the Access Now shutdown record provide the incident check. [2][3][4][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's B1 evidence supports 2.0/4. Restrictions are recurrent and safeguards are only partly effective.
B2Website and service blocking1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: No comprehensive national filtering system is established, but conflict, state pressure, and armed control produce uneven access to reliable information and independent reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and private discussion 0/4; DSP's 2025 political-filtering estimate 3/4; the country OONI dashboard supplies direct network measurements. [3][1][4]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's B2 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
B3Removal and filtering orders1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: No comprehensive national filtering system is established, but conflict, state pressure, and armed control produce uneven access to reliable information and independent reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and private discussion 0/4; DSP's 2025 political-content censorship estimate 4/4; online-speech legal protection 4/4. [2][1][3][4]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's B3 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
B4Intermediary liability1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: No comprehensive national filtering system is established, but conflict, state pressure, and armed control produce uneven access to reliable information and independent reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 4/4; protection against legal abuse by political elites 2/4. [2][1][3][4]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's B4 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
B5Circumvention and cross-border access1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: No comprehensive national filtering system is established, but conflict, state pressure, and armed control produce uneven access to reliable information and independent reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and private discussion 0/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 3/4; independence from state-controlled social platforms 3/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the circumvention check. [3][1][4]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's B5 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
C
30% weight
Free Expression & Civic Space
Violence, harassment, or impunity materially limits journalism and civic participation online.
20.06.0 / 30 points
C1Legal protection for expression1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Journalists face intimidation from state authorities, armed groups, and Russian-linked forces, while insecurity and weak newsroom capacity constrain public-interest reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and private discussion 0/4; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 4/4; the relevant Freedom House country score 5/100. [1][7][5][8]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's C1 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
C2Speech-related offenses0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Journalists face intimidation from state authorities, armed groups, and Russian-linked forces, while insecurity and weak newsroom capacity constrain public-interest reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and due process 0/4; DSP's protection against abuse of defamation and copyright law 2/4; Freedom House country reporting supplies the offense and enforcement record. [2][1][5][8]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's C2 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
C3Arrests and penalties0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Journalists face intimidation from state authorities, armed groups, and Russian-linked forces, while insecurity and weak newsroom capacity constrain public-interest reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded due process 0/4 and equal treatment under law 0/4; DSP's 2025 political-arrest estimate 1/3; CPJ and Freedom House records provide the documented case check. [2][5][1][8]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's C3 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
C4Harassment, violence, and digital attacks1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Journalists face intimidation from state authorities, armed groups, and Russian-linked forces, while insecurity and weak newsroom capacity constrain public-interest reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and equal treatment under law 0/4; the 2026 RSF press-freedom score 56.7/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the violence, harassment, and accountability record. [5][8][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's C4 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
C5Civic participation and pluralism1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Journalists face intimidation from state authorities, armed groups, and Russian-linked forces, while insecurity and weak newsroom capacity constrain public-interest reporting.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded political choice free from domination 0/4 and assembly freedom 0/4; DSP's online-media pluralism estimate 2/4; ordinary people's online civic-mobilization estimate 2/4. [2][1][5][8]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's C5 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
D
20% weight
Privacy, Anonymity & User Security
Broad surveillance powers and limited independent authorization weaken privacy and anonymity.
20.04.0 / 20 points
D1Data protection rights1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Weak data safeguards, security-force access, and armed-group power expose communications despite the practical availability of some encrypted services.; DSP's privacy-law existence measure 1/1; privacy-law constraint on government access 3/4. [6][1][2][7]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's D1 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
D2Surveillance law and authorization0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Weak data safeguards, security-force access, and armed-group power expose communications despite the practical availability of some encrypted services.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 0/4 and due process 0/4; DSP's protection from political social-media monitoring 3/4. [1][7][2]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's D2 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
D3Retention, access, and identity mandates0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Weak data safeguards, security-force access, and armed-group power expose communications despite the practical availability of some encrypted services.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded private discussion 0/4 and due process 0/4; DSP's privacy-law constraint on government access 3/4; protection from political monitoring 3/4; UNCTAD and Freedom House records provide the retention and identity-law check. [1][6][2][7]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's D3 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
D4Targeted surveillance and spyware1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Weak data safeguards, security-force access, and armed-group power expose communications despite the practical availability of some encrypted services.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 1/4 and equal treatment under law 0/4; DSP's protection from political monitoring 3/4; the RSF press-freedom environment 56.7/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the targeted-surveillance case record. [5][1][2][7]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's D4 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
D5Encryption and anonymity1.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Weak data safeguards, security-force access, and armed-group power expose communications despite the practical availability of some encrypted services.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded private discussion 0/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 3/4; protection from political monitoring 3/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the encryption and anonymity check. [3][1][2][7]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's D5 evidence supports 1.0/4. The right is severely restricted and effective safeguards are weak.
E
20% weight
Rule of Law & Accountability
No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.
5.01.0 / 20 points
E1Judicial independence and due process0.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Courts and regulators lack the independence, reach, and security needed to constrain executive or armed actors and provide dependable nationwide remedies.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 0/4 and due process 0/4. [7][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's E1 evidence supports 0.0/4. The record matches the zero-point anchor.
E2Independent regulators0.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Courts and regulators lack the independence, reach, and security needed to constrain executive or armed actors and provide dependable nationwide remedies.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded government safeguards against corruption 0/4 and government openness and transparency 0/4. [7][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's E2 evidence supports 0.0/4. The record matches the zero-point anchor.
E3Government transparency0.0 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Courts and regulators lack the independence, reach, and security needed to constrain executive or armed actors and provide dependable nationwide remedies.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded government openness and transparency 0/4. [7][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's E3 evidence supports 0.0/4. The record matches the zero-point anchor.
E4Notice, appeal, and remedy0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Courts and regulators lack the independence, reach, and security needed to constrain executive or armed actors and provide dependable nationwide remedies.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 0/4 and due process 0/4. [7][1]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's E4 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
E5Open and multistakeholder policymaking0.5 / 4
Observed record
Central African Republic: Courts and regulators lack the independence, reach, and security needed to constrain executive or armed actors and provide dependable nationwide remedies.; Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded elected officials' authority 0/4 and assembly freedom 0/4; DSP's online civic-mobilization estimate 2/4. [2][1][7]
Scoring judgment
Central African Republic's E5 evidence supports 0.5/4. Only narrow residual protection remains.
Country findings
03Findings by pillar.
These are the principal findings for each scored part of the report. The indicator records above provide the supporting detail.
Open Internet & Content Controls
Shutdowns, throttling, or platform restrictions have been used during protests, elections, conflict, or unrest.
[2][3][4]Free Expression & Civic Space
Violence, harassment, or impunity materially limits journalism and civic participation online.
[2][5][8]Privacy, Anonymity & User Security
Broad surveillance powers and limited independent authorization weaken privacy and anonymity.
[6][1]Rule of Law & Accountability
No dependable independent remedy constrains political censorship or surveillance in practice.
[7][1]Research record
04Coverage
Central African Republic, assessed from January 1 through December 31, 2025.
Evidence
Network measurements, legal and institutional datasets, shutdown records, and documented cases support the findings.
Scoring
Twenty indicators measure content openness, expression, privacy, security, and institutional checks under Methodology v0.3.
Source register
05Sources used for this report.
Country reporting, open measurements, and cross-national datasets form the report record.
- 01Freedom HouseCentral African Republic: Freedom in the World 2026 country report ↗Civil society · 2026 edition
- 02Digital Society ProjectDigital Society Project Dataset v8 ↗Independent measurement · 2000–2025 country-year data
- 03Open Observatory of Network InterferenceCentral African Republic measurement dashboard ↗Independent measurement · Accessed July 17, 2026
- 04Access Now and the #KeepItOn coalitionInternet Shutdowns in 2025 Annual Report ↗Civil society · March 2026
- 05Committee to Protect Journalists2025 journalist prison census and case database ↗Civil society · January 21, 2026
- 06UN Trade and DevelopmentData protection and privacy legislation worldwide ↗International organization · Accessed July 17, 2026
- 07World Justice ProjectRule of Law Index 2025 ↗Independent measurement · October 28, 2025
- 08Reporters Without BordersCentral African Republic: World Press Freedom Index 2026 profile ↗Civil society · May 2026