Free and Open
This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.
Cabo Verde · 2026
Open access, competitive institutions, and broad protection for expression support a strong result. Privacy enforcement and limited regulatory capacity cause most deductions.
Finding
01Open access, competitive institutions, and broad protection for expression support a strong result. Privacy enforcement and limited regulatory capacity cause most deductions.
The score draws on country reporting, network measurements, shutdown records, journalist cases, privacy law, and rule-of-law data. The indicator findings below show how that evidence was converted into points. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
This is the weighted total of the four scored pillars.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.
8 cited sources support this assessment.
Scored assessment
02Each indicator receives 0–4 points. Five indicators form a pillar. The pillar average is converted to a percentage and multiplied by its published weight.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
Cabo Verde: DSP's 2025 shutdown-practice estimate 4/4; social-media shutdown estimate 4/4; OONI measurements and the Access Now shutdown record provide the incident check. [2][3][4]
Cabo Verde's B1 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and private discussion 4/4; DSP's 2025 political-filtering estimate 4/4; the country OONI dashboard supplies direct network measurements. [3][1]
Cabo Verde's B2 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and private discussion 4/4; DSP's 2025 political-content censorship estimate 4/4; online-speech legal protection 4/4. [2][1]
Cabo Verde's B3 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 4/4; protection against legal abuse by political elites 4/4. [2][1]
Cabo Verde's B4 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and private discussion 4/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 4/4; independence from state-controlled social platforms 4/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the circumvention check. [3][1]
Cabo Verde's B5 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Online political debate is broad and legal protections generally remain effective.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and private discussion 4/4; DSP's online-speech legal protection estimate 4/4; the relevant Freedom House country score 92/100. [1][7]
Cabo Verde's C1 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and due process 3/4; DSP's protection against abuse of defamation and copyright law 4/4; Freedom House country reporting supplies the offense and enforcement record. [2][1]
Cabo Verde's C2 evidence supports 4.0/4. The record matches the strongest published anchor.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded due process 3/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; DSP's 2025 political-arrest estimate 3/3; CPJ and Freedom House records provide the documented case check. [2][5][1]
Cabo Verde's C3 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; the 2026 RSF press-freedom score 72.0/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the violence, harassment, and accountability record. [5][8][1]
Cabo Verde's C4 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded political choice free from domination 4/4 and assembly freedom 4/4; DSP's online-media pluralism estimate 3/4; ordinary people's online civic-mobilization estimate 2/4. [2][1]
Cabo Verde's C5 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.
Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded judicial independence 4/4 and due process 3/4; DSP's protection from political social-media monitoring 3/4. [1][7]
Cabo Verde's D2 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded private discussion 4/4 and due process 3/4; DSP's privacy-law constraint on government access 4/4; protection from political monitoring 3/4; UNCTAD and Freedom House records provide the retention and identity-law check. [1][6]
Cabo Verde's D3 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded media freedom 4/4 and equal treatment under law 4/4; DSP's protection from political monitoring 3/4; the RSF press-freedom environment 72.0/100; CPJ and Freedom House reporting provide the targeted-surveillance case record. [5][1]
Cabo Verde's D4 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded private discussion 4/4; DSP's political-filtering estimate 4/4; protection from political monitoring 3/4; OONI and Freedom House records provide the encryption and anonymity check. [3][1]
Cabo Verde's D5 evidence supports 3.5/4. Protection is strong, with a bounded exception preventing full credit.
Independent courts, regulators, and public procedures provide meaningful checks and remedies.
Cabo Verde: Freedom House's 2026 country scorecard recorded elected officials' authority 4/4 and assembly freedom 4/4; DSP's online civic-mobilization estimate 2/4. [2][1]
Cabo Verde's E5 evidence supports 3.0/4. Protection is generally effective, with recurring but bounded shortcomings.
Country findings
03These are the principal findings for each scored part of the report. The indicator records above provide the supporting detail.
No systematic political filtering or state-directed shutdown pattern was established in the reviewed record.
[2][3][4]Online political debate is broad and legal protections generally remain effective.
[2][5][8]Privacy law provides meaningful rights, but exemptions, enforcement gaps, or intelligence powers remain material.
[6][1]Independent courts, regulators, and public procedures provide meaningful checks and remedies.
[7][1]Research record
04Cabo Verde, assessed from January 1 through December 31, 2025.
Network measurements, legal and institutional datasets, shutdown records, and documented cases support the findings.
Twenty indicators measure content openness, expression, privacy, security, and institutional checks under Methodology v0.3.
Source register
05Country reporting, open measurements, and cross-national datasets form the report record.